Aggressive B-cell lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other high-grade subtypes are a persistent oncologic challenge because of their heterogeneity and relapse potential. Classical approaches to disease surveillance, such as imaging and tissue biopsy, suffer from limitations in sensitivity and specificity for residual disease detection. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential biomarker for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring, offering real-time information regarding tumor burden and response to therapy. This review discusses the application of ctDNA in aggressive B-cell lymphoma, emphasizing its utility in early relapse detection, response monitoring, and therapeutic decision-making. We review the technological innovations that facilitate ctDNA detection, its prognostic significance, and the promise of ctDNA-based monitoring to inform optimized personalized treatment approaches. With ongoing clinical trials confirming the utility of ctDNA in lymphoma care, its incorporation into standard practice has the potential to transform MRD assessment, enhancing patient outcomes and avoiding unnecessary toxicity from over-treatment.
Aggressive B-cell lymphomas like DLBCL, Burkitt lymphoma, and high-grade B-cell lymphomas contribute to a major subset of hematologic malignancies. Even with improved personalized therapy, including immunochemotherapy and targeted therapies, a proportion of patients relapse due to undetectable residual disease that escapes standard imaging modalities. Measurable residual disease (MRD) has become an important prognostic factor in hematologic malignancies, providing information regarding response to treatment and risk of relapse. Although bone marrow biopsies and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans are still routine methods for MRD assessment, they are not without limitations, such as invasiveness and false-negative results.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides a non-invasive, highly sensitive method for MRD assessment in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. ctDNA is tumor-derived genetic material released into the blood, giving a molecular signature of the malignancy. The capacity to monitor ctDNA levels in real-time enables early detection of relapse, monitoring of therapy, and individualized treatment modification. This review discusses the application of ctDNA as an MRD marker, its superiority over conventional techniques, and the implications of ctDNA-directed strategies in the clinical setting.
ctDNA is derived from tumor cells undergoing apoptosis or necrosis, releasing fragmented DNA into the bloodstream. Its concentration varies based on tumor burden, treatment response, and disease progression. Unlike total cell-free DNA (cfDNA), ctDNA carries tumor-specific mutations, allowing for precise detection of residual disease.
Several technologies have been developed to detect ctDNA with high sensitivity:
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS): Allows for comprehensive mutation profiling, identifying lymphoma-specific genetic alterations such as MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements.
Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR): A highly sensitive method for detecting known mutations, enabling precise quantification of ctDNA levels.
Targeted Hybrid Capture Assays: Enhance specificity by enriching tumor-derived DNA fragments for sequencing.
The choice of ctDNA detection method depends on clinical context, cost considerations, and the need for broad versus targeted mutation detection.
1. ctDNA for Early Diagnosis and Risk Stratification
Early identification of aggressive B-cell lymphomas is still difficult because of the non-specificity of symptoms and the requirement for invasive biopsy. ctDNA analysis offers the possibility of early diagnosis through the detection of lymphoma-specific mutations before clinical or radiologic presentation. Research has shown that patients with high baseline levels of ctDNA have poor outcomes, implying a role in risk stratification.
2. ctDNA as a Prognostic Biomarker
Several investigations have defined the prognostic value of ctDNA in high-grade lymphomas. High levels of ctDNA at presentation are associated with higher tumor burden and poorer survival. Additionally, early clearance of ctDNA after the start of treatment is also predictive of good prognosis, while the persistent presence of ctDNA indicates a high risk of relapse. Integration of ctDNA quantitation into risk models may further improve risk-adapted treatment strategies.
3. ctDNA for Monitoring Treatment Response
Traditional response evaluation is based on PET-CT scans, which are insensitive to minimal residual disease. ctDNA levels decrease in responders and can be used as an early indicator of treatment response. Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring enables dynamic tracking during therapy, with real-time information on disease kinetics. Patients with incomplete clearance of ctDNA might be treated with intensified therapy, whereas those with a rapid decline in ctDNA might be candidates for de-escalation approaches.
4. ctDNA in Early Relapse Detection
Perhaps the most promising use of ctDNA is the detection of relapse at an early stage. Recent studies have identified that positivity for ctDNA is several months before clinical or radiologic relapse, allowing for earlier therapeutic intervention. Scheduled surveillance for ctDNA after treatment may allow for preemptive interventions and thereby improve long-term survival.
5. ctDNA-Guided Personalized Therapy
The molecular heterogeneity of aggressive B-cell lymphomas requires individualized treatment strategies. ctDNA profiling can detect actionable mutations to direct targeted therapy choices. For example, patients with BCL2 or MYC alterations can be treated with emerging inhibitors like venetoclax or BET inhibitors. Furthermore, ctDNA-driven adaptive therapy permits treatment adjustment by real-time disease kinetics.
Despite the promising potential of ctDNA, several challenges must be addressed before widespread clinical implementation:
Standardization of Detection Methods: Variability in ctDNA assays and reporting metrics necessitates standardized protocols for clinical integration.
False Positives and Negatives: Low ctDNA levels in remission may lead to false-negative results, while clonal hematopoiesis could contribute to false positives.
Defining Clinical Thresholds: Establishing ctDNA cutoffs for treatment escalation or de-escalation requires large-scale prospective studies.
Cost and Accessibility: The high cost of NGS-based ctDNA assays may limit widespread adoption, necessitating cost-effective alternatives.
Ongoing clinical trials aim to validate ctDNA as an MRD marker in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Future advancements in single-molecule sequencing, machine learning-based interpretation, and integration with imaging modalities may further enhance ctDNA utility in lymphoma management.
Circulating tumor DNA is a revolutionary biomarker for MRD measurement in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Its capacity to monitor disease in real-time, non-invasively provides a paradigm shift in the management of lymphomas, allowing for early relapse identification, response evaluation, and tailored therapeutic approaches. Despite issues with assay standardization and clinical validation, research and technology are on the cusp of making ctDNA a standard part of lymphoma treatment. Through the incorporation of ctDNA-guided methods into clinical protocols, we may streamline treatment selection, reduce waste from unnecessary toxicity, and enhance survival in the case of high-risk B-cell lymphoma.
Read more such content on @ Hidoc Dr | Medical Learning App for Doctors
1.
The use of biomarkers in the treatment of breast lumps is at a crossroads.
2.
According to JAMA, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors are not significantly linked to prostate cancer mortality.
3.
How Do Younger People Fare With Stool Tests for CRC Screening?
4.
Dual Targeted CAR-T Yields 99% Response Rate in Pediatric ALL
5.
Is It Really Cancer? More Concerns About Accelerated Approval; Metformin and Cancer
1.
How Parvovirus B19 Affects Pregnant Women and Their Unborn Babies
2.
Breaking Barriers: Innovative Approaches in Brain Tumor Treatment
3.
Introduction to Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
4.
Unveiling the Chadwick Sign: A Revolutionary New Tool for Detecting Early Signs of Cancer
5.
The Different Types of Cysts and Why They Occur: Insights from a Dermatologist
1.
International Lung Cancer Congress®
2.
Genito-Urinary Oncology Summit 2026
3.
Future NRG Oncology Meeting
4.
ISMB 2026 (Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology)
5.
Annual International Congress on the Future of Breast Cancer East
1.
Current Cancer Scenario in India- Importance of Genomic Testing & Advancement in Diagnosis and Treatment
2.
Preventing Blood Clots: The Importance of Venous Thromboembolism Management
3.
A Panel Discussion on Clinical Trial End Point for Tumor With PPS > 12 months
4.
Newer Immunotherapies for Myeloma- A Comprehensive Overview
5.
Navigating the Complexities of Ph Negative ALL - Part XII
© Copyright 2025 Hidoc Dr. Inc.
Terms & Conditions - LLP | Inc. | Privacy Policy - LLP | Inc. | Account Deactivation