Can AI Surgeons Replace the Human Touch? Exploring ChatGPT in Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a precise radiation therapy technique for treating tumors. While AI tools like ChatGPT are making inroads in healthcare, this review explores the potential benefits and limitations of ChatGPT compared to the human touch in SRS. We examine how ChatGPT can streamline tasks and personalize treatment plans, while acknowledging the irreplaceable role of human expertise, empathy, and patient interaction in successful SRS delivery.

Introduction

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a minimally invasive treatment delivering high-dose radiation to tumors with pinpoint accuracy. Traditionally, SRS relies on the expertise of neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and physicists. However, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT raises intriguing questions: Can AI replace the human touch in SRS?

ChatGPT in SRS: A Streamlined Workflow

ChatGPT, a large language model, holds promise for improving SRS efficiency:

• Automated Treatment Planning: ChatGPT can analyze patient data and generate personalized treatment plans, potentially accelerating the planning process.

• Data Analysis and Reporting: ChatGPT can analyze vast amounts of medical data, aiding in identifying optimal treatment targets and predicting potential side effects.

• Standardization and Quality Control: AI tools can ensure consistency and reduce human error in SRS workflows.

The Irreplaceable Human Touch in SRS

Despite AI's potential, human expertise remains critical in SRS for several reasons:

• Clinical Judgment and Decision-Making: Complexities arise during SRS due to patient anatomy, tumor characteristics, and potential complications. Human judgment is crucial for navigating these complexities and making optimal treatment decisions.

• Patient Communication and Emotional Support: SRS can be emotionally taxing for patients. Physicians provide crucial emotional support, address patient concerns, and build trust throughout the treatment process.

• Ethical Considerations: AI tools lack the ethical reasoning and empathy necessary to navigate complex ethical decisions that may arise during SRS.

The Future of SRS: A Collaborative Approach

The future of SRS likely lies in a collaborative approach:

• AI as a Decision-Support Tool: ChatGPT can assist medical professionals by analyzing data, generating treatment options, and highlighting potential risks.

• Human Expertise in Steering the Course: Physicians will retain ultimate control over treatment decisions, leveraging AI insights while applying their clinical judgment and patient-centered approach.

Conclusion

ChatGPT represents a valuable tool for streamlining tasks and enhancing data analysis in SRS. However, the human touch remains essential for navigating medical complexity, providing emotional support, and ensuring ethical decision-making. The future of SRS lies in collaboration, where AI empowers physicians to deliver even more personalized and effective care. Further research and development are crucial to optimize the collaborative approach and ensure responsible integration of AI tools in patient care.